The Impact of Offshore Wind Farms on Marine Biodiversity in the North Sea
The North Sea, a highly productive marine ecosystem, has become a focal point for the development of offshore wind farms (OWFs) as part of global efforts to transition to renewable energy. While OWFs contribute significantly to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, their construction and operation have raised concerns about their impact on marine biodiversity. The North Sea supports a diverse range of species, including seabirds, fish, benthic organisms, and marine mammals, all of which may be affected by the presence of OWFs. This paper examines the cumulative effects of OWFs on marine biodiversity in the North Sea, focusing on both positive and negative outcomes, and explores strategies to mitigate adverse impacts while maximizing ecological benefits.
The North Sea Ecosystem and Offshore Wind Farms
The North Sea is a semi-enclosed Atlantic marginal sea characterized by shallow waters, strong tidal currents, and high biological productivity. It serves as a critical habitat for numerous species, including commercially important fish stocks and migratory seabirds. The rapid expansion of OWFs in this region has introduced new structures into the marine environment, altering habitats and potentially disrupting ecological processes.
OWFs consist of turbines mounted on fixed or floating foundations, connected by underwater cables. Their construction involves significant seabed disturbance, noise pollution, and the introduction of artificial hard substrates. Once operational, OWFs can create artificial reefs, alter local hydrodynamics, and emit low-frequency noise, all of which may influence marine biodiversity.
Positive Impacts on Marine Biodiversity
Artificial Reef Effects
The foundations of OWFs act as artificial reefs, providing attachment surfaces for sessile organisms such as mussels, barnacles, and anemones. These structures can enhance local biodiversity by creating new habitats for benthic species. Ter Hofstede et al. (2022) found that OWFs in the North Sea contribute to increased epibenthic biodiversity, particularly in areas with previously low habitat complexity. The colonization of turbine foundations by filter-feeding organisms can also improve water quality by reducing suspended particulate matter.
Fish Aggregation
OWFs often attract fish species seeking shelter or foraging opportunities. The complex structures of turbine foundations provide refuge for juvenile fish, potentially supporting fish populations. Bonsu et al. (2024) highlighted that certain fish species, such as cod and plaice, have been observed in higher densities around OWFs, suggesting that these structures may serve as de facto marine protected areas.
Reduced Fishing Pressure
The exclusion of commercial fishing activities within OWF zones can indirectly benefit marine biodiversity. Püts et al. (2023) noted that the establishment of OWFs has led to reduced trawling in some areas, allowing benthic habitats to recover and supporting the resurgence of species sensitive to fishing pressure.
Negative Impacts on Marine Biodiversity
Seabird Displacement and Mortality
Seabirds are particularly vulnerable to the effects of OWFs. The construction and operation of turbines can lead to habitat loss, displacement, and collision risks. Peschko et al. (2024) documented the cumulative effects of OWFs on common guillemots (Uria aalge) in the southern North Sea, noting significant displacement from foraging grounds and increased mortality due to collisions. These impacts are exacerbated by the overlap between OWF locations and critical seabird habitats.
Noise Pollution
Underwater noise generated during the construction and operation of OWFs can disturb marine mammals and fish. Pile-driving activities, in particular, produce high-intensity noise that can cause hearing damage, behavioral changes, and displacement. Li et al. (2023) emphasized that noise pollution from OWFs poses a significant threat to cetaceans, such as harbor porpoises, which rely on acoustic signals for communication and navigation.
Benthic Habitat Alteration
The installation of OWFs involves extensive seabed disturbance, which can destroy benthic habitats and displace resident species. Coolen et al. (2023) reported that the construction of OWFs in the North Sea has led to the loss of soft-sediment communities, including polychaetes and bivalves, which play crucial roles in nutrient cycling and sediment stability.
Electromagnetic Fields
Submarine cables used to transmit electricity from OWFs to the shore emit electromagnetic fields (EMFs), which may affect species sensitive to such stimuli. Watson et al. (2024) highlighted that EMFs can interfere with the navigation and behavior of elasmobranchs (sharks and rays) and other electro-sensitive species, potentially disrupting their migration patterns and feeding behaviors.
Mitigation Strategies
Strategic Site Selection
Careful planning and site selection can minimize the impact of OWFs on sensitive habitats and species. Furness and Furness (2025) proposed the use of spatial planning tools to identify areas with low ecological value for OWF development, thereby reducing conflicts with biodiversity conservation goals.
Noise Reduction Technologies
Implementing noise mitigation measures, such as bubble curtains and quieter pile-driving techniques, can reduce the acoustic impact of OWF construction. Li et al. (2023) recommended the adoption of these technologies to protect marine mammals and fish from noise-induced stress and injury.
Artificial Reef Design
Optimizing the design of turbine foundations to enhance their ecological value can maximize the benefits of artificial reef effects. Ter Hofstede et al. (2022) suggested incorporating features that promote the colonization of diverse benthic species and provide habitat complexity for fish.
Marine Spatial Planning
Integrating OWF development with marine spatial planning can ensure the coexistence of renewable energy production and biodiversity conservation. Püts et al. (2023) emphasized the importance of stakeholder collaboration and adaptive management in balancing the needs of fisheries, OWFs, and marine protected areas.
Monitoring and Research
Long-term monitoring and research are essential to assess the cumulative effects of OWFs on marine biodiversity and inform adaptive management strategies. Bonsu et al. (2024) called for increased investment in scientific studies to improve understanding of the ecological interactions between OWFs and marine ecosystems.
Conclusion
The development of offshore wind farms in the North Sea presents both opportunities and challenges for marine biodiversity. While OWFs contribute to renewable energy goals and can enhance local biodiversity through artificial reef effects and reduced fishing pressure, they also pose risks to seabirds, marine mammals, and benthic communities. Strategic site selection, noise reduction technologies, and marine spatial planning are critical for mitigating adverse impacts and maximizing ecological benefits. Continued research and monitoring are essential to ensure that the expansion of OWFs aligns with biodiversity conservation objectives in the North Sea.
References
Bonsu, P.O., Letschert, J., Yates, K.L., Svendsen, J.C., Berkenhagen, J., Rozemeijer, M.J., Kerkhove, T.R., Rehren, J. and Stelzenmüller, V., 2024. Co-location of fisheries and offshore wind farms: Current practices and enabling conditions in the North Sea. Marine Policy, 159, p.105941.
Furness, R.W. and Furness, E.N., 2025. Strategic seaweed farming to support protected seabirds impacted by offshore windfarms. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 210, p.115266.
Li, C., Coolen, J.W., Scherer, L., Mogollón, J.M., Braeckman, U., Vanaverbeke, J., Tukker, A. and Steubing, B., 2023. Offshore wind energy and marine biodiversity in the North Sea: life cycle impact assessment for benthic communities. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(16), pp.6455-6464.
Peschko, V., Schwemmer, H., Mercker, M., Markones, N., Borkenhagen, K., Garthe, S., 2024. Cumulative effects of offshore wind farms on common guillemots (Uria aalge) in the southern North Sea-climate versus biodiversity?. Biodiversity and Conservation, 33(3), pp.949-970.
Püts, M., Kempf, A., Möllmann, C. and Taylor, M., 2023. Trade-offs between fisheries, offshore wind farms and marine protected areas in the southern North Sea–winners, losers and effective spatial management. Marine Policy, 152, p.105574.
Ter Hofstede, R., Driessen, F.M.F., Elzinga, P.J., Van Koningsveld, M. and Schutter, M., 2022. Offshore wind farms contribute to epibenthic biodiversity in the North Sea. Journal of Sea Research, 185, p.102229.
Watson, S.C., Somerfield, P.J., Lemasson, A.J., Knights, A.M., Edwards-Jones, A., Nunes, J., Pascoe, C., McNeill, C.L., Schratzberger, M., Thompson, M.S. and Couce, E., 2024. The global impact of offshore wind farms on ecosystem services. Ocean & Coastal Management, 249, p.107023.
